Michael Shapcott on Housing
Shapcott 2009 (June to date)
 

Some files on this page are in Adobe Portable Document Format - PDF - 
The Adobe READER is FREE!

Get Adobe READER

  
  • SALVATION ARMY CALLS FOR NATIONAL HOUSING POLICY! - Posted May 19, 2009

    Powerful new research from Salvation Army underlines critical need for affordable homes:
    Poverty shouldn’t be a life sentence, says Salvation Army

    The Salvation Army in Canada, the largest operator of homeless shelters in the country, has released a powerful new research report that underlines the critical need for affordable housing to meet the challenges of homelessness and deep and persistent poverty across Canada.

    Poverty shouldn’t be a life sentence” includes a detailed survey of the people who use Salvation Army shelters, along with the staff. It reveals that one-quarter of homeless men have jobs; two-thirds of shelter users have income from welfare or employment; nearly half of shelter users suffer from health issues; affordable housing is the first step to resolving homelessness.

    The bottom line: “The Salvation Army urges the federal government to develop a national housing strategy that includes ending homelessness as a priority. Without a national framework, addressing all of these issues at its

    foundation, individuals experiencing homelessness and poverty will continue to have difficulty building permanent and safe lives.”

    -          Michael

     
  • WI backgrounder: Making history in Ontario - Politicians join to unanimously back anti-poverty law - Posted May 7, 2009

    Ontario’s Legislative Assembly dropped its usual partisan divisions for a few moments earlier today (Wednesday) to give unanimous consent to third and final reading of Bill 152, the province’s anti-poverty law. The bill – which will pass into law once it receives Royal Assent (expected shortly) – is a critical step towards a more equitable, healthier and fairer province. The Wellesley Institute was pleased to play a strong role in gaining significant amendments to the legislation, including a strong commitment to strengthening Ontario’s third sector. We were invited by Ontario’s anti-poverty minister, Deb Matthews, to join with our partners in the 25 in 5 Network for Poverty Reduction in the public gallery of the Legislature to observe the final vote. This note explains why the bill matters and what’s in the legislation, underlines the critical amendments to the draft law, and sets out next steps.

    WHY THE BILL MATTERS: The bill, once it becomes law, will bind the current and future governments to take specific steps to end poverty in Ontario. Any law can be changed by a future government, but changing legislation is more difficult (and more public) than quietly dropping a political promise or campaign commitment. Declarations, promises and commitments are often made by politicians (and they are important, in their own right), but there’s nothing binding or enduring about these kinds of statements. Legislation carves the commitments into law – and that’s why it is so important that Ontario will soon have an anti-poverty law.

    WHAT’S IN THE LEGISLATION: Bill 152 is available here. It’s pretty simple. It makes an overall commitment to “establish mechanisms to support a sustained, long-term reduction of poverty in Ontario”. The bill sets out:
    • key principles for poverty elimination,
    • commits the government to make a “specific poverty reduction target”,
    • establishes indicators to measure progress in meeting the stated target, and
    • sets out a timeline and ongoing consultation process.

    CRITICAL AMENDMENTS: The Ontario government adopted a number of important amendments to the draft legislation during the committee review process, including amendments proposed by the Wellesley Institute and our partners in the 25 in 5 Network for Poverty Reduction. Among the many improvements to the draft law, the Ontario government:

    • explicitly recognizes that the third sector (non-profit, charitable and voluntary groups) are integral to poverty reduction plans, and
    • recognizes the need to address inequities and inequalities among Ontarians.

    Minister Matthews, in speaking to the Legislature during Question Period immediately before the law was passed, thanked the many groups that helped to improve the legislation. She also singled out Michael Prue, the MPP for Beaches-East York, for his stellar work. The bill, as amended, isn’t perfect. But it sets the framework for a detailed poverty elimination strategy, including strengthening the province’s third sector.

    NEXT STEPS: The government is launching a detailed review of income assistance rules and regulations, and will start a consultation to develop a comprehensive affordable housing plan later in the spring. The Ministry of Finance has promised a consultation on government procurement rules (an important lever to support social enterprises across the province).

    The Wellesley Institute is committed to working with our partners to ensure that the Ontario government takes the pragmatic and practical steps, and commits the necessary funding, to realize the commitments set out in Bill 152.

    - Michael

     

  • WI backgrounder: When it comes to pandemics, not everyone is affected equally  - Posted April 29, 2009

    Just posted on the Wellesley Institute web site at www.wellesleyinstitute.com:

    Everybody is affected by a pandemic, but not everyone is affected equally. That’s the sobering conclusion of a new research and policy paper released today by the Wellesley Institute. As the world braces for a possible swine flu pandemic, the need for proper pandemic planning and effective emergency responses is drawn into sharp focus. Ontario’s current health disaster plans recognize the need to address inequities and inequalities, but fail to deliver the funding or resources to meet the requirements of all Ontarians.

    Research paper: “Bridging the Preparedness Divide
    Policy paper: “
    When It Comes to Pandemics, No One Can Be Left Out
    Media advisory: “
    Pandemic plans need to recognize not everyone is affected equally

    -Michael

     
  • WI backgrounder: Ontario finally allocates Aboriginal housing dollars, neglects to credit federal funds - Posted April 20, 2009

    The Ontario government announced earlier today that it will allocate the remaining $60 million of an $80 million federal off-reserve Aboriginal housing trust fund to the Ontario Aboriginal Housing Support Services Association. The federal dollars were authorized by Parliament in 2005 and assigned to Ontario in 2006. It has taken Ontario almost three years to allocate the federal dollars. The province signed a deal with the Ontario Federation of Indian Friendship Centres, the Métis Nation of Ontario Secretariat and the Ontario Native Women’s Association to fund more than 500 low-income Aboriginal households outside the Greater Toronto Area at an average of $120,000 per-unit.

    The province signed a legal agreement with Aboriginal housing and service providers in the GTA to allocate $20 million for 350 new homes (an average subsidy of $62,500) in November of 2008. In both announcements, Ontario housing minister Jim Watson and Aboriginal affairs minister Brad Duguid claimed full credit. Minister Duguid said: "This initiative is another example of the Ontario government taking action to improve social conditions for Aboriginal people," without thanking or acknowledging that the funds came entirely from the federal government.

    - Michael
     
  • Alberta makes down payment on 10-year housing plan - Posted April 14, 2009

    The Alberta budget, released today, makes the first down payment on the province's recently released multi-billion dollar, ten-year housing plan. Here is an excerpt from today's budget documents on housing:

    HOMELESSNESS INITIATIVES / AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAMS

    Homelessness Initiatives. With Budget 2009, implementation of the 10-year plan to end homelessness in Alberta begins. The 2009-12 Capital Plan includes $100 million in 2009-10, and $400 million over three years to support development of about 2,700 housing units for the homeless. Another $107 million in operating support is budgeted in 2009-10. This includes nearly $41 million to support over 3,600 spaces in emergency/transitional shelters, and $32 million to provide outreach support services to about 1,000 homeless Albertans this year.

    Affordable Housing Programs. The province remains committed to develop 11,000 new affordable housing units. The 2009-12 Capital Plan includes $178 million in 2009-10, and $468 million over three years for affordable housing. Operating support is budgeted at $103 million in 2009-10, including $56 million for the rent supplement program. This year, about 8,600 clients of the Homeless and Eviction Prevention Fund will be transitioned to the rent supplement program. This will help manage costs while meeting clients' needs for stable and affordable housing.

    The full budget documents are posted here... http://tinyurl.com/ckksj

    More detailed analysis to follow...

    - Michael

     
  • [hhno-on] Homeless in Halifax: New report card from CAH - Posted on March 24, 2009

A total of 1,252 people stayed in homeless shelters in Halifax, Nova Scotia, in 2008, according to the first-ever Halifax Report Card on Homelessness 2009, which was released today. The report, prepared by Community Action on Homelessness, provides a grim accounting of the poor health and terrible conditions facing people who are homeless in a community that is, for many Canadians, a picturesque port city on Canada's eastern coast. The report documents the meagre investments in affordable homes by federal and Nova Scotia governments, and sets out a series of practical and pragmatic actions to end homelessness in Halifax.

- Michael

  • WI backgrounder: Ontario's $624.5 million investment 'substantial down payment' on provincial housing plan - Posted on March 24, 2009

TORONTO: Ontario has made a substantial down payment to meet the housing needs of tens of thousands of people who are precariously housed or homeless. Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty and housing minister Jim Watson have announced plans today to invest $624.5 million over the next two years in affordable housing initiatives. When combined with matching federal dollars, it amounts to more than $1.2 billion. The Ontario government says that the money will be used to fund:

  • repairs to 50,000 rundown social housing homes (including energy efficiency) for a combined federal-provincial investment of $704 million (an average of $14,000 per unit); and,
  • funding for 4,500 new affordable homes for seniors, people with disabilities and other low-income households for a combined federal-provincial investment of $545 million (an average of $120,000 per unit).
  • The funding for the 4,500 new affordable homes will flow in three categories:
  • $370 million for affordable homes for seniors and people with disabilities; and,
  • $175 million for affordable homes by extending the existing Canada-Ontario affordable housing program.

Not only will 55,000 households get new or renovated homes, but there will be a multi-billion-dollar boost to the provincial economy, including thousands of good quality jobs in the construction and related sectors, at a time when the stimulus is urgently needed. The new investments will also breathe life into the consultations for a new provincial housing plan, which are expected to start in the next two or three months.

Today’s provincial housing announcement meets the first priority set out by the Wellesley Institute in our 2009 budget recommendations to the Government of Ontario, which was to fully match federal affordable housing dollars. But provincial housing investments still lag behind the deep and persistent need across the province, and Ontario is lagging behind provides such as Alberta in making commitments for urgently needed new housing investments.

Ontario has done well to make the substantial down payment towards a new provincial housing strategy, but it must keep moving forward. Additional investments are required in new homes to meet the growing housing needs across the province; repairs to rundown housing; a new Ontario housing benefit to help the one-in-four Ontario households that are living in unaffordable homes; plus support services for people with physical and mental health concerns, and emergency relief (shelters, support and transitional housing) to help the tens of thousands of Ontarians who are experiencing homelessness.

- Michael
 

The Alberta government has today released a dramatic plan to end homelessness in 10 years by committing $1.2 billion in capital investments and $2 billion in operating funding.

The plan – based on the “housing first” approach (which provides immediate housing and then offers supports as required) – will lead to the creation of 11,000 new homes by 2012, according to the provincial government. Full details, including funding and implementation lines, will be released in next month’s provincial budget. Alberta’s plan – the first of its kind among the federal government and Canada’s provinces and territories – builds on top of a record of dramatic increases in affordable housing investments in recent years.

Alberta cut provincial affordable housing investments in the early 1990s, as did many other provinces, but has dramatically increased investments in the past couple of years. From fiscal 2007 to 2008 (the latest year for which numbers are available), Alberta’s housing investments jumped 140% to $4.57 billion – a record increased compared to other provinces.

With today’s announcement, Alberta’s investments are scheduled to continue to increase. The critical details of the Alberta plan will be closely scrutinized by housing experts (more detailed analysis from the Wellesley Institute will follow), but the news has surprised more than a few housing advocates who don’t expect the Alberta government to be blazing the lead on critical social policy issues such as affordable housing. Compared to Ontario, for instance, Alberta – at about one-quarter the population – is making investments in affordable housing that are substantially higher than Ontario, which is leading to the creation of more affordable homes in that province.

Much of the credit for today’s announcement goes to active and energetic housing groups in Calgary, Edmonton, Red Deer and many other municipalities which created local 10-year housing plans and then “uploaded” the requirements to meet those plans to the provincial level.

- Michael
 

  • WI Backgrounder: B.C. Auditor Weighs In - That Province's Homeless Programs 'Not successful'‏ - Posted on March 8, 2009

On Thursday, Miloon Kothari, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Right to Adequate Housing, delivered a powerful critique of Canada’s failure to meet its international housing obligations. That same day, John Doyle, the auditor for British Columbia, delivered an equally devastating critique of that province’s homeless programs. Thanks to Jill Clements in Victoria for sharing the news from the west coast.

John Doyle, the British Columbia auditor, has just released a sobering review of homelessness programs that concludes that the provincial government “has not been successful in reducing homelessness. Clear goals and objectives for homelessness and adequate accountability for results remain outstanding. Government also lacks adequate information about the homeless and about the services already available to them — this hampers effective decision making. Finally, government has not yet established appropriate indicators of success to improve public accountability for results.”

The auditor’s report echoes many of the themes raised by the United Nations’ Special Rapporteur on the Right to Adequate Housing in the final report on his fact-finding mission to Canada, which will be tabled at the UN Human Rights Council on Monday. The auditor calls for a much more thorough and pragmatic plan to end homelessness in British Columbia, and notes that many other jurisdictions have already adopted solid plans.

A key observation of the B.C. auditor:
“We found significant activity and resources being applied to homelessness issues but there is no provincial homelessness plan with clear goals and objectives. The foundation of many best practices appear to be in place. However, the absence of clear goals and objectives raises questions about whether the right breadth and intensity of strategies are being deployed. This is further complicated by the lack of good comprehensive information about the nature and extent of homelessness in the province. Homeless counts identify only the ‘visible’ homeless; those in shelters and those found on the streets. The ‘hidden’ homeless, those staying temporarily with friends or family, are not counted. The continuing increase in the number of homeless counted suggests a lack of success in managing homelessness, let alone reducing it. When there are no clear goals or performance targets, accountability for results is missing. How will we know we are successful if we have not identified success?”

- Michael
 

  • WI backgrounder: UN to Canada - you need a national housing plan! - Posted on March 5, 2009

Canada urgently needs a “comprehensive and coordinated national housing policy” to meet its international housing rights obligations, according to a powerful new report from Miloon Kothari, the United Nations’ Special Rapporteur on the Right to Adequate Housing that is being tabled at the United Nations’ Human Rights Council in Geneva on Monday. The report, available at < http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/10session/A.HRC.10.7.Add.3.pdf >, is based on Mr. Kothari’s recent fact-finding mission to Canada.

“Canada is the only major country in the world without a national housing plan – and that leaves local communities to cope with deep and persistent housing insecurity and homelessness on their own,” says Michael Shapcott, Senior Policy Fellow at the Wellesley Institute. “As a leading and well-respected global expert on housing and homelessness, Mr. Kothari is telling Canada that it is failing to meet its fundamental obligations in international law. This is the latest in a series of damning reports from the United Nations – and should be a clear warning that Canada needs to adopt the practical recommendations set out by Mr. Kothari.” For instance, in May 2006, the United Nations’ Committee on Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights concluded its review of Canada by calling housing insecurity and homelessness “a national emergency” and noted that “most of its 1993 and 1998 recommendations have not been implemented”.

The Wellesley Institute, a research and policy institute celebrating its first decade of advancing urban health, worked with Mr. Kothari and United Nations’ officials to help organize his meetings with community and academic experts across Canada. In his report, Mr. Kothari reviewed general housing and homelessness concerns, examined issues facing women and Aboriginal people, and studied the housing impact of the Vancouver Olympics.

“The recent federal budget includes an additional $2 billion for affordable housing, and the new investments are welcome,” says Mr. Shapcott. “However, it’s one-time only dollars and won’t repair the fraying patchwork of federal programs and investments that have been condemned by Mr. Kothari. Federal affordable housing investments have been eroding in recent years and are set to fall to their lowest level in more than a quarter century.”

- MIchael
 

  • [hhno-on] Ignatieff and the federal budget... a proposal... - Posted January 29, 2009

Now that Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff has announced he will support the federal budget, as long as the feds agree to issue accountability reports in March, June and December, we need to seize the strategic opportunity. No matter what our personal (or partisan) views about Ignatieff's decision, these accountability reports (if the concession is accepted by the Harper government) will give us an opportunity to define the critical housing issues and issue our own assessment of whether the federal budget is meeting those concerns. Some of us have already criticized the federal budget for being too prescriptive when it comes to housing (the feds will only allow the investments to be spent on a short list of their priorities - seniors, people with disabilities, social housing repairs), too many restrictions (including the matching funds requirement - which has hobbled previous federal-provincial-territorial housing deals) and totally missing the point (the "driveways and decks!
" renovation tax credit - which only goes to people who already own a home and have about $9,000 in cash to put down before they get their $1,400 federal tax credit). We've put out our own overall set of budget proposals (including the $2.5 billion ask and the emergency relief ask), so we can prepare and release our own accountability reports to coincide with the federal reports - assessing whether the federal budget is, in fact, helping the people who are hurting the most in the current recession.

And, as an aside, it has been suggested that we might want to consider launching a national campaign to encourage homeowners or cottagers who have an extra $9,000 sitting around to use it to build a deck, claim their renovation tax credit, and then invite a homeless family to come live under their deck.

- Michael

 

  • Budget 2009: Estimates of the Provincial/Territorial Shares of Cost-shared Federal Housing Programs - Posted January 29, 2009

As you know, the federal budget on Tuesday had three cost-shared housing programs (social housing renovation, seniors’ housing and housing “for people with disabilities”). I am trying to get the specific numbers and mechanisms from federal officials. In the meantime, I have prepared a simple chart that sets out the allocation of the funding on a per capita basis. This may, or may not, be the actual allocation model that the feds use, but it at least gives us a start in understanding the numbers. The attached chart shows, on a per capita basis, the amount of money from each of the three programs for each province and territory, the total federal contribution, and the provincial / territorial matching share that will be required to access the federal dollars.

 

All Original Contents Copyright © 2008
National Aboriginal Housing Association (NAHA)

Website designed by
wwwebworks